Shimon Even was born in Israel on June 15th, 1935.
He died on May 1st, 2004.
In addition to his pioneering research contributions (most notably to Graph Algorithms and Cryptography), Shimon is known for having been a highly influential educator. He played a major role in establishing computer science education in Israel (e.g., at the Weizmann Institute and the Technion). He served as a source of professional inspiration and as a role model for generations of young students and researchers.
|How do you communicate the fascinating character of a person to people who were not fortunate to have met him? One way of doing this is telling stories.|
The first memories are from his legendary Graph Algorithms class. I vividly recall my admiration to his style of presenting material; always focusing on the key ideas and on the underlying intuition. I was even more amazed by his never-failing ability to "hit the point" every time he answered our questions (i.e., he would always understand what is actually underlying our confusion or doubt and respond to it). He seemed to me the personification of wisdom, indeed god-like. Needless to say, the thought of being his student had never crossed my mind.
Half a year later, in the summer vacation after my 2nd undergraduate year, I was traveling in Europe. I was in London, it was almost 11PM, and the last Tube was about to leave the center of the city. I ran through the entire station and entered the wagon with the doors slamming behind me. I almost fell on a distinguish Lord who was sitting across the door. After a moment, I told myself "strange, this majestic Lord looks like Professor Even" and then we recognized each other. It turned out that we were heading to the same station, and then to the same hotel. So Shimon and Tamar invited me to their room for a midnight cup of tea. There was a nice conversation, but this was not the beginning of a wonderful friendship. He was very friendly and I did notice this fact, but this did not make me feel comfortable with him. How could I have been comfortable with somebody I viewed as a Greek God.
Our ways crossed again only a year later. I was selected to be his TA in that legendary course, and somehow I became his graduate student. One thing just led to another, or maybe it was only my perception and he had it all planned. In any case, in spite of all his efforts, I could never rid myself from the feeling that I was dealing with a (Greek) God. Throughout all the years that followed, I loved him and I knew he loved me, but I had to force myself to call him "Shimon" -- even calling his attention (without calling him by any name) felt too daring.
This is my story. It probably sound weird and says more about me than about him. But still, I believe that it explains the big paradox of how come that a warm and open person like Shimon may induce such "fear" (where by "fear" I mean the Hebrew word used in "fear of god", a term that is a hybrid of "fear" and "deep respect" and "love").
In 1978, as an undergraduate, I attended Shimon's course Graph Algorithms. At some point, one student was annoyed at Shimon's "untraditional" way of analyzing algorithms, and asked whether Shimon's demonstrations constituted a proof and if so what is a proof. Shimon answer was immediate, short, and clear: A proof is whatever convinces me.
Many years later, when first seeing the definition of interactive proofs, I was reminded of Shimon's answer. I think that interactive proofs are a perfect formalization of Shimon's intuition: interactive proofs are indeed convincing, and essentially any convincing demonstration is actually an interactive proof. A few years later, I started using Shimon's answer as a motto for surveys on probabilistic proof systems.
Here is a story that seems most appropriate to the current era in which we (scientists, especially those not at Weizmann) face administrations (i.e., VERA, VATAT, and the government) that reason only via money and power...
In the late 1970s, when becoming chairman of CS at the Technion, Shimon noted that the computer used for teaching was more adequate for a historical display. He asked for a meeting with the Technion's president, in which he requested permission to buy a new computer. The president refused Shimon's request by saying that the department already has a computer, and remained unconvinced by Shimon's explanation that this "piece of junk" is worthless (beyond its junk-yard value). "For all I know", the president said, "you have a computer".
A week later, Shimon phoned the president and asked again for a new computer. The conversation went on as follows.
President: I already told you that you have a computer, so you don't need a new one.Well, the next academic year was opened with a new computer...
Shimon: But I don't have a computer.
President: What do you mean?
Shimon: I sold it.
President: What did you do???
Shimon: I sold it as junk.
President: Who allowed you to do this???
Shimon: I don't need permission to sell old equipment (see Technion's Regulations, Article No. NNN).
President: So what do you want now?
Shimon: Your permission to buy a new computer.
President: You are NOT getting it!
Shimon: So I'm not opening the next academic year. We cannot teach Computer Science without a computer.
President: We'll see about this.
Shimon: Yes, we'll see about this. I'm not opening the next academic year without a computer.
One days somebody was presenting to Shimon a problem, and wanted to proceed to motivated it with a practical application. Shimon, who cared very much about practice, stopped him and said: When I see a natural problem I don't care about practical applications.
A main characteristic of Shimon, which made him a role model to many, is his attitude towards doing research; and, in particular, his attitude towards starting and completing research projects.
The starting point for research was always a natural problem, with clear intuitive contents, regarding efficient computation. The emphasis here is on the subject matter, efficient computation, and on the clear intuitive contents of the question being asked in the context of this general subject matter.
Regarding the competition of a research project, this did not occur when the main results were achieved, but rather after obtaining a deep understanding of their underlying principles and providing clear expositions of these principles to the relevant research community.
I'm sure Shimon did not consider the fact that Dinitz's version uses less notions (and relies on a more sophisticated data structure) an advantage; certainly not when an exposition to undergraduates is concerned.
I find this story very typical of Shimon. Firstly, it is clear that he wanted to understand the algorithm as soon as possible, and if he could not do it by penetrating the inventor's mindframe then he just used the clues given by the intentor to invent his own version. Next, he polished this own version to perfection, rather than struggled to see how his version fits the original one. Finally, years later, when having the opportunity to meet the inventor, he was very amused to learn of the inventor's view of his version. Thus, although Shimon liked the stories behind the research very much, understanding the actual contents of the research took clear priority.
I am not sure if the following description is originally Shimon's, but I did hear it from him. It refers to researchers that would understand in five minutes what it takes others months to understand, but they will never understand more than that.
What I find interesting is that Shimon would express admiration both to these fast thinkers and to the slower but deeper thinkers that may surpass them at times. Indeed, in some cases he added this sentence after explicitly expressing admiration to such a fast thinker. I took this as a demonstration of the deep pluralism which characterized Shimon, although it was not evident in superficial encounters with him.
See memorial page for Shimon Even and the legancy of Shimon Even (2014).
Back to Oded Goldreich's homepage.